From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17282 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2008 18:17:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 17274 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Aug 2008 18:17:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate6.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate6.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.155) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:16:27 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate6.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m78IG9M5272622 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:16:09 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m78IG9e62969816 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 20:16:09 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m78IG8kk027408 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 20:16:09 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id m78IG8qF027405; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 20:16:08 +0200 Message-Id: <200808081816.m78IG8qF027405@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 20:16:08 +0200 Subject: Re: [7/7] Adjust the SPU linux native target To: pedro@codesourcery.com (Pedro Alves) Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:17:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <200808080240.50260.pedro@codesourcery.com> from "Pedro Alves" at Aug 08, 2008 02:40:50 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > Unfortunatelly, I have no means to test this. Ulrich, does this look OK? > > You only need patches 1, 2 and this one for the SPU changes. These three patches pass testing on spu-elf with no regressions. > 2008-08-08 Pedro Alves > > * spu-linux-nat.c (spu_child_post_startup_inferior) > (spu_child_post_attach): Don't add the main thread here. Assuming the rest of the series goes in, this patch is OK. Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com