From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15965 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2008 17:41:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 15955 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2008 17:41:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:41:18 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCB398397; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:41:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC7E9835A; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:41:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KPL6Q-0002r2-US; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:41:14 -0400 Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches ml , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA][patch 1/9] Yet another respin of the patch with initial Python support Message-ID: <20080802174114.GA10761@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Thiago Jung Bauermann , Tom Tromey , gdb-patches ml , Eli Zaretskii References: <20080429155212.444237503@br.ibm.com> <20080429155304.288626880@br.ibm.com> <20080528205921.GA2969@caradoc.them.org> <20080615181833.uxmo25mg0kko40kw@imap.linux.ibm.com> <1216107418.14956.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1216245620.12209.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080718195010.GA14356@caradoc.them.org> <1216653969.31797.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1216653969.31797.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:26:09PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Hi people, > > This is today's version of the patch. :-) > It addresses the latest review comments, and is good to go AFAIK. This patch is OK once the documentation is approved. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery