From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3051 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2008 17:41:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 2931 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2008 17:41:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:41:10 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5E698376; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:41:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DAF98139; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:40:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KMnlE-0004EM-TR; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:40:52 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Tom Tromey Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 2/9] export values mechanism to Python Message-ID: <20080726174052.GA15966@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Tromey , Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080429155212.444237503@br.ibm.com> <20080429155304.466637516@br.ibm.com> <20080528212451.GB2969@caradoc.them.org> <1215410598.1795.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080726025425.GB1895@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00487.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:17:04AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > There do seem to be a number of methods defined in value.h. I don't > know whether it makes sense to expose most of these to python, though. Oh, I think it does - I'm just not sure how many of them will make sense as instance methods rather than less object-oriented functions. The operators we've already got covered. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery