From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-57454-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6975 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2008 02:43:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 6948 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2008 02:43:16 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:42:57 +0000
Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B1398215; 	Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:42:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055439809F; 	Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:42:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1KMZk8-0001RZ-T5; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:42:48 -0400
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:43:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Gdbtk configury changes
Message-ID: <20080726024248.GA1895@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <488A3C85.4000506@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <488A3C85.4000506@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00466.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:50:13PM -0700, Keith Seitz wrote:
> For reasons unknown to me

???

> I have been working on eliminating the need 
> for Tcl, Tk, and Itcl to come from the source tree.

Great!

It looks fine.  The only thing I noticed was...

> @@ -1663,9 +1652,8 @@ procfs.o: $(srcdir)/procfs.c
>  	$(CC) -c $(INTERNAL_WARN_CFLAGS) $(srcdir)/procfs.c
>  
>  v850ice.o: $(srcdir)/v850ice.c
> -	$(CC) -c $(INTERNAL_CFLAGS) $(IDE_CFLAGS) $(ITCL_CFLAGS) \
> -		$(TCL_CFLAGS) $(TK_CFLAGS) $(X11_CFLAGS) \
> -		$(GDBTK_CFLAGS) \
> +	$(CC) -c $(INTERNAL_CFLAGS) $(IDE_CFLAGS) $(ALL_TCL_CFLAGS) \
> +		$(X11_CFLAGS) $(GDBTK_CFLAGS) \
>  		$(srcdir)/v850ice.c
>  
>  # Message files.  Based on code in gcc/Makefile.in.

This file doesn't seem to exist any more.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery