From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [FYI] Inlining support, rough patch
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080725142551.GA15973@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <umyk6ysql.fsf@gnu.org>
Thanks for looking at this.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 04:54:10PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > +There are some ways that @value{GDBN} cannot pretend that inlined
> > +function calls are the same as normal calls:
> > +
> > +@itemize @bullet
> > +@item
> > +You cannot set breakpoints on inlined functions. @value{GDBN}
> > +either reports that there is no symbol with that name, or else sets the
> > +breakpoint on the non-inlined copy of the function.
> > +
> > +@item
> > +Setting breakpoints at the call site of an inlined function may not
> > +work, because the call site does not contain any code. @value{GDBN}
> > +may incorrectly move the breakpoint to the next line of the enclosing
> > +function, after the call.
> > +
> > +@item
> > +@value{GDBN} cannot locate the return value of inlined calls after
> > +using the @code{finish} command.
> > +
> > +@end itemize
>
> This is IMO too negative: you state several problems and never hint on
> how to work around them. Please consider suggesting such workarounds
> in each one of the above 3 situations. Using breakpoints and returned
> values reported by `finish' are two very fundamental debugging
> techniques; telling the readers that they are simply unavailable will
> lead them to believe debugging code that uses inlined functions is
> next to impossible.
Is this better?
There are some ways that @value{GDBN} does not pretend that inlined
function calls are the same as normal calls:
@itemize @bullet
@item
You cannot set breakpoints on inlined functions. @value{GDBN}
either reports that there is no symbol with that name, or else sets the
breakpoint only on non-inlined copies of the function. This limitation
will be removed in a future version of @value{GDBN}; until then,
set a breakpoint by line number on the first line of the inlined
function instead.
@item
Setting breakpoints at the call site of an inlined function may not
work, because the call site does not contain any code. @value{GDBN}
may incorrectly move the breakpoint to the next line of the enclosing
function, after the call. This limitation will be removed in a future
version of @value{GDBN}; until then, set a breakpoint on an earlier line
or inside the inlined function instead.
@item
@value{GDBN} cannot locate the return value of inlined calls after
using the @code{finish} command. This is a limitation of compiler-generated
debugging information; after @code{finish}, you can step to the next line
and print a variable where your program stored the return value.
@end itemize
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-25 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-13 19:39 Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-06-13 19:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-06-23 12:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-06-23 14:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-02 19:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-03 11:22 ` [FYI] Inlining support, rough patch [break-by-function-name] Jan Kratochvil
2008-07-03 16:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-12 7:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-07-08 0:12 ` [FYI] Inlining support, rough patch Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-15 19:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-17 23:53 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-07-18 13:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <200807251446.m6PEkfwc027635@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
2008-07-25 17:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-03-31 3:06 ` Tom Tromey
2009-03-31 20:49 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-03-31 22:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-04-20 15:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-04-20 15:54 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-06-27 18:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-28 10:16 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-06-28 13:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-30 16:11 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-30 16:50 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-04-22 22:04 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-04-23 3:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-23 5:56 ` Stan Shebs
2009-04-23 12:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-18 17:55 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-20 9:57 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-06-20 19:28 ` Samuel Bronson
2009-04-24 21:44 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-07-18 2:02 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-07-18 3:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-20 14:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-25 13:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-25 14:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-07-25 16:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-26 5:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080725142551.GA15973@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox