From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: lift no-argument restriction on observers
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080721155556.GA4218@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3bq0wxgse.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:54:57PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I noticed a comment in observer.texi to the effect that no-argument
> observers are not possible. Sure enough, observer.sh does not handle
> this case, and there is one observer that takes a dummy argument to
> work around this problem.
>
> This patch lifts the restriction by changing observer.sh. It also
> modifies that one observer to remove the dummy argument.
>
> Tested on x86 F8, no regressions. Ok?
Ok.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-21 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-17 22:55 Tom Tromey
2008-07-21 15:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080721155556.GA4218@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox