From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12314 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2008 14:32:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 12305 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jul 2008 14:32:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:32:15 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC8D98417 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:32:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB1E9840B for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:32:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KI2cV-0007og-NZ for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:32:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [MI non-stop 05/11, RFA] -exec-continue/-exec-interrupt --all Message-ID: <20080713143211.GA29727@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200806282045.39438.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080711133434.GA2651@caradoc.them.org> <20080713042447.GA30405@caradoc.them.org> <200807130836.22263.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200807130836.22263.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 08:36:22AM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Yes. mi_getopt is not capable of handling --all. It can only handle -a, which > seems ugly to me. Are --thread, --frame, and --all the only long options? Maybe mi_getopt can be improved, if we expect more in the future. > > Also, please remember to post the version of patches that you check > > in. > > OK, will do. Thanks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery