From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [gdbserver] Fix attaching notices
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807111812.02067.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080711141326.GA5455@caradoc.them.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1007 bytes --]
A Friday 11 July 2008 15:13:26, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:58:33AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > 2) change the test to:
> >
> > if (stop_soon == STOP_QUIETLY_NO_SIGSTOP
> > && stop_signal == TARGET_SIGNAL_STOP
> > && stop_signal == TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP)
>
> Ought to be some || in there :-)
>
No kidding! No more posting at 3AM for me. :-)
> > {
> > stop_stepping (ecs);
> > stop_signal = TARGET_SIGNAL_0;
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > Or even add a `&& stop_signal == TARGET_SIGNAL_0', and merge
> > this stop_soon with STOP_QUIETLY_REMOTE.
>
> I don't think I understand.
>
I think this is the same insanity as above :-)
> Allowing both stop and trap sounds reasonable to me. We already rely
> on there not being other sources of SIGTRAP.
Here a patch for that. I confirmed that the SIGTRAP notice is gone against
gdbserver, and ran the the attaching into signals tests, and the
attach.exp test nativelly, and all pass cleanly.
--
Pedro Alves
[-- Attachment #2: stop_soon_no_sigstop.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1691 bytes --]
2008-07-11 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
* infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Also ignore a
TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP on a STOP_QUIETLY_NO_SIGSTOP.
---
gdb/infrun.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: src/gdb/infrun.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/infrun.c 2008-07-11 16:33:00.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/infrun.c 2008-07-11 16:41:51.000000000 +0100
@@ -2543,13 +2543,20 @@ targets should add new threads to the th
}
/* This originates from attach_command(). We need to overwrite
- the stop_signal here, because some kernels don't ignore a
- SIGSTOP in a subsequent ptrace(PTRACE_CONT,SIGSTOP) call.
- See more comments in inferior.h. On the other hand, if we
+ the stop_signal here, because some kernels don't ignore a
+ SIGSTOP in a subsequent ptrace(PTRACE_CONT,SIGSTOP) call.
+ See more comments in inferior.h. On the other hand, if we
get a non-SIGSTOP, report it to the user - assume the backend
- will handle the SIGSTOP if it should show up later. */
+ will handle the SIGSTOP if it should show up later.
+
+ Also consider that the attach is complete when we see a
+ SIGTRAP. Some systems (e.g. Windows), and stubs supporting
+ target extended-remote report it instead of a SIGSTOP
+ (e.g. gdbserver). We already rely on SIGTRAP being our
+ signal, so this is no exception. */
if (stop_soon == STOP_QUIETLY_NO_SIGSTOP
- && stop_signal == TARGET_SIGNAL_STOP)
+ && (stop_signal == TARGET_SIGNAL_STOP
+ || stop_signal == TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP))
{
stop_stepping (ecs);
stop_signal = TARGET_SIGNAL_0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-11 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-27 23:26 Pedro Alves
2008-07-07 17:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-07 23:52 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-08 1:59 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-11 14:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-11 17:12 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2008-07-11 17:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807111812.02067.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox