From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19294 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2008 14:35:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 19275 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2008 14:35:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:35:36 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B9F98416; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:35:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1C198376; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:35:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KHJif-0001u1-OT; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:35:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:35:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Paul Koning Cc: sandra@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [remote protocol] support for disabling packet acknowledgement Message-ID: <20080711143533.GB7286@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Koning , sandra@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com References: <48765B8A.6080805@codesourcery.com> <18550.24158.544203.163257@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <48766999.6070001@codesourcery.com> <18550.28000.759268.379468@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20080710223312.GA19058@caradoc.them.org> <18551.25421.553226.304326@djudge-us-nas.equallogic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18551.25421.553226.304326@djudge-us-nas.equallogic.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00212.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:42:37AM -0400, Paul Koning wrote: > Fair enough. Ok, thanks. Thank you, too - I'm glad you got us thinking about this from a different perspective and we may have something that will satisfy unreliable links, now. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery