From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11051 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2008 03:47:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 11043 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jul 2008 03:47:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:47:10 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530919835A; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 03:47:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3744D9810F; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 03:47:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KGQe2-0005b7-Pr; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:47:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:47:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [non-stop] 08/10 linux native support Message-ID: <20080709034706.GA21192@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200806152205.49241.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200806252217.25796.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080625221220.GB5723@caradoc.them.org> <200807020434.50543.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080707182009.GE1778@caradoc.them.org> <1215573936.3549.126.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1215573936.3549.126.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:25:36PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > Fork is undefined in a multi-threaded program. According to what? Not POSIX - otherwise there wouldn't be pthread_atfork. I think even vfork is valid in multithreaded programs; in any case, it behaves sensibly with NPTL. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery