From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3669 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2008 19:22:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 3616 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2008 19:22:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:22:13 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA8F98415; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:22:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B6A9805C; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:22:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KFwHr-0003N5-0K; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:22:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Stan Shebs Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Make monitor targets always have a thread Message-ID: <20080707192210.GA12780@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Stan Shebs , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200807031623.29562.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080707191235.GD11544@caradoc.them.org> <48726B91.2050808@earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48726B91.2050808@earthlink.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 12:16:33PM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 04:23:29PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >>> Does it look OK? Can anyone instruct me how to test this; or do a test >>> spin for me; or claim that it looks ok, and we'll fix problems as >>> they arise? :-) >>> >> >> It's OK. I don't have any way to test monitor either. >> > Yeah, I wonder how long it's been since any of those monitor targets have > been tested, they seem to be bordering on obsolescence. In theory, someone reported success during my round of code deletion (~ 18 months ago). I think it was Maciej, but I don't remember. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery