From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16472 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2008 16:20:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 16464 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2008 16:20:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:19:42 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FE698415; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:19:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774969805C; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:19:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KFtRD-0000YX-La; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:19:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] add gstdint.h file that just includes stdint.h Message-ID: <20080707161939.GA1778@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080627204515.GM3954@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080627204515.GM3954@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 04:45:15PM -0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > As suggested by Daniel (Thank You!) to fix a problem when including > stdint.h and gstdint.h at the same time (happens when including > a libdecnumber file from a GDB file). More info at: > > http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-06/msg00514.html > > 2008-06-27 Joel Brobecker > > * gstdint.h: New file. > > Tested on mips-irix by verifying that it allows us to compile dfp.c, > and on x86-linux. OK to apply? Yes, this is OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery