From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26959 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2008 01:16:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 26949 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2008 01:16:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:15:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2377C2A969C; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:15:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7s+Ymdh6hbLz; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:15:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1EA2A9615; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:15:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C9707E7ACD; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:15:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:16:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Markus Deuling Cc: GDB Patches , msnyder@redhat.com, joseph@codesourcery.com, Daniel Jacobowitz , Ulrich Weigand Subject: Re: [rfc] Replace current_gdbarch in *mips* Message-ID: <20080701011555.GA2071@adacore.com> References: <48648F3A.9070400@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48648F3A.9070400@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 Hi Markus, > this patch replaces most of the current_gdbarch's found in *mips*. > These replacements are mostly mechanical changes. Unfortunately I dont > have access to MIPS (linux, bsd, remote) machines. This patch is > hence only "tested" by building GDB with --enable-targets=all. I finally checked out the results of the testing on mips-irix, and they came out OK. Beware that this only takes care of testing the changes inside mips-tdep.c and even so the results on this platform are not stellar. Nonetheless, it's nice to see that it didn't reveal any new visible regression! :-) -- Joel