From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26371 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2008 18:42:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 26362 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2008 18:42:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:42:12 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D296898414; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:42:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D3E9840B; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:42:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KDOKH-0003KB-Hn; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:42:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:47:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Tom Tromey Cc: Michael Snyder , Eli Zaretskii , Vladimir Prus , marc.khouzam@ericsson.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [MI non-stop 04/11] Implement --thread and --frame. Message-ID: <20080630184209.GA12763@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Tromey , Michael Snyder , Eli Zaretskii , Vladimir Prus , marc.khouzam@ericsson.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200806282044.14246.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04E1BD85@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <200806291003.28226.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <1214850171.3601.1516.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00597.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:35:03PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Snyder writes: > > >> #define DSC(str) (const unsigned char *)str, sizeof str - 1 > > Michael> Boy... IMHO, I find that *very* obscure. > > Haha, you should see the rest of libcpp ;) > > Michael> I wouldn't like reading code that used that, > Michael> if I had no idea what it was or where it was defined. > Michael> Granted it's also clever... > > Yeah. IME it isn't so bad once you've looked it up a couple of times. > I don't even know what "DSC" stands for though... bah. Maybe "descriptor"? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery