From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3657 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2008 14:01:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 3649 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2008 14:01:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:01:17 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EED398413; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:01:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D6D9840B; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:01:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KDJvp-0006Qs-Pt; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:00:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:25:00 -0000 From: "drow@false.org" To: Orjan Friberg Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Ricard =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wanderl=F6f?= Subject: Re: [rfc] Delay slots on cris Message-ID: <20080630140037.GA24679@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Orjan Friberg , Hans-Peter Nilsson , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Ricard =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wanderl=F6f?= References: <200806300838.m5U8ciPp005155@ignucius.se.axis.com> <4868CFAB.8050505@axis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4868CFAB.8050505@axis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00588.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:20:59PM +0200, Orjan Friberg wrote: > Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: >>> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:40:31 -0400 >>> From: Daniel Jacobowitz >> >>> ERP is rarely saved - so by default frame_unwind_register and >>> get_frame_register will find the same value - I believe the copy we >>> want is the current frame's (i.e. the one whose current PC is pointing >>> at the branch). Right? >> >> That certainly sounds reasonable > > Agreed. Thanks - I checked in the patch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery