From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9751 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2008 20:28:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 9740 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2008 20:28:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:28:11 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m5SKR6n1026982; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:27:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id m5SKR5vm017784; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:27:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:42:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200806282027.m5SKR5vm017784@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: uweigand@de.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20080628164257.GA5827@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:42:57 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfc/rft] Update remaining targets to value-based unwinding References: <200805182015.m4IKFQmx030794@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20080529164003.GB11646@caradoc.them.org> <200805291645.m4TGjCRu006229@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080628164257.GA5827@caradoc.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00566.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:42:57 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 06:45:12PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:40:03 -0400 > > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > > > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:15:25PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > > Hi Ulrich, > > > > > > At this point I think you've gotten all the likely testing; is it time > > > to commit this? > > > > I'm already looking at m88k; if you commit it Ulrich, can you leave > > that bit out? > > Mark, did you have a chance to finish m88k? Ulrich, how do you feel > about committing the non-m88k bits now? Or I can take care of it if > that's easier. Sorry, no. I've been travelling for the last three weeks; flying home later today. Hopefuly I'll get to finish it soon after I return.