From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 633 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2008 18:57:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 623 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jun 2008 18:57:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:57:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7371FF123; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:57:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id I0Awgk4yiyCz; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:57:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069D21FF1B6; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:57:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26CEAE7ACD; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:57:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:35:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] gnu-nat.c: possibly fix "info threads" test failures Message-ID: <20080619185700.GA3739@adacore.com> References: <000001c8d19f$a7c3a040$f74ae0c0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20080619035356.GA23549@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <000c01c8d1d7$bcd1a990$3674fcb0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20080619135632.GB16956@caradoc.them.org> <000401c8d229$d5daaf70$81900e50$@u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000401c8d229$d5daaf70$81900e50$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00355.txt.bz2 > 2008-12-19 Pierre Muller > > * gnu-nat.c (proc_string): Use capital T for "Thread". This looks fine. I checked really carefully that you only changed that one letter inside the string, so hopefully two pair of eyes is enough :). -- Joel