From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19293 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2008 13:57:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 19280 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jun 2008 13:57:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:56:35 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5EE98410; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:56:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF4598243; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:56:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K9Kcq-0004Q0-HX; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:56:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] win32-nat.c: fix "info threads" test failures Message-ID: <20080619135632.GB16956@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <000001c8d19f$a7c3a040$f74ae0c0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20080619035356.GA23549@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <000c01c8d1d7$bcd1a990$3674fcb0$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000c01c8d1d7$bcd1a990$3674fcb0$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:43:09AM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote: > Thanks, > committed now. > > Should I submit a similar patch for gnu-nat.c? > The main problem is that I have no way to > run a testsuite that would use the modified code... I think you should go ahead. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery