From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19506 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2008 13:48:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 19496 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jun 2008 13:48:21 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:48:03 +0000 Received: (qmail 7896 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2008 13:48:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 11 Jun 2008 13:48:02 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: mi-break.exp intermitent failure Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:11:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Vladimir Prus References: <200806111259.13949.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806111448.09065.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 A Wednesday 11 June 2008 14:38:56, Vladimir Prus wrote: > As I've told on IRC, the test should be using mi_expect_stop; I've no idea > why I did not covert it when I've introduced mi_expect_stop but I've > checked in the following patch. Can you check that no unexpected > failures happen for you now. All perfect. Thanks! -- Pedro Alves