From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19982 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2008 12:06:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 19970 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2008 12:06:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:06:31 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1258298402; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:06:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDAF298401; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:06:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K5g8p-0001Pp-7s; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:06:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Hans-Peter Nilsson Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Simulators --with-pkgversion --with-bugurl support Message-ID: <20080609120627.GA5396@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Hans-Peter Nilsson , "Joseph S. Myers" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080608143927.C38609@dair.pair.com> <20080608151104.P91373@dair.pair.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080608151104.P91373@dair.pair.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:13:38PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > > +version.c: Makefile ../../gdb/version.in > > > > Could it be done some other way? For example with a placeholder > > sim/version.in automatically updated from (depending on) > > gdb/version.in? Or just having a separate sim/version.in? > > Looking closer, the presence of the gdb subdir by itself doesn't > seem to be of significance or at all trig anything, as opposed > to gdb/configure, so maybe the most pragmatic solution is to add > gdb/version.in to the sim CVS module. > > Would that be ok? That sounds fine. I was worried about sim tarballs, but we don't make any; we only package sim with gdb. I've updated the modules file. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery