From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7022 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2008 18:09:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 7014 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2008 18:09:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:09:13 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384339840C; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 18:09:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E58E9840A; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 18:09:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K5PKH-0001cR-F2; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:09:09 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Warn on constant value watchpoints Message-ID: <20080608180909.GA6199@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080608155302.GA25486@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 09:04:43PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > (gdb) watch 0x4343548 > > Watchpoint 1: 70530376 > > Should we allow such watchpoints? under what circumstances are they > useful? In my opinion, we should not allow such watchpoints. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery