Re: [PATCH] Another annotation for threads

Tom Tromey
2008-06-06T02:44:56Z

>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:

Daniel> On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:06:16PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> Is this how things "ought" to work? I mean ideally?

Daniel> Yes. But there was disagreement over when a particular observer
Daniel> ought to be called.

I think I missed an earlier thread about this.

This disagreement could be solved, somewhat hackily, by adding more
information to the observer notification, so observers can more easily
discard the ones they are not interested in.

Anyway, thanks for responding. I don't want to talk about it too much
in the abstract -- but I did want to get a general idea for changes we
write on the Python branch, and I think I understand now.

Tom