From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2314 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2008 20:43:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 2301 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jun 2008 20:43:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:42:43 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169D3983F8; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:42:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87089809F; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:42:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K4MIC-00018P-T2; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:42:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:43:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [new patch] Re: [RFC] Fix for gdb crash in "info thread" after exec(). Message-ID: <20080605204240.GB3818@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Paul Pluzhnikov , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves References: <20080527190702.6956D3A6952@localhost> <200805281626.50992.pedro@codesourcery.com> <8ac60eac0805281009r29e394d2y2b285f31349b253f@mail.gmail.com> <200805281901.28831.pedro@codesourcery.com> <8ac60eac0806041816s41f854b9u455f648fc8995310@mail.gmail.com> <1212686557.3601.369.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1212686557.3601.369.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 10:22:37AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 18:16 -0700, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > > Ping, > > > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-05/msg00727.html > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > > ... > > > New patch attached. Can anyone approve (or reject) this? > > Well, I'll throw my two cents in and say that it looks > reasonable -- I'd give good odds that it's right, but it's > been too long since I worked closely on linux threads for > me to say positively. You're right - the patch is correct :-) Pedro, could you add an FSF copyright notice to the new C file before you check it in? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery