Re: [PING2] : [RFC/RFA] PING: skip __main

Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-30T15:23:01Z

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
> Thanks for the fast reply.
>
> > I'm afraid I think that skip_main_constructor_call is too long as a name.
>
> I am perfectly willing to use something shorter,
> the only problem is to find something that would still be
> of clear meaning.
>
> maybe
> skip_main_prologue
> would be better?

Just skip_main_constructor?

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery