From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5445 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2008 15:50:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 5389 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jun 2008 15:50:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:50:36 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3066B9840A; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:50:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFD398409; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:50:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K4HjV-0008Fx-2H; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:50:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Implement *running. Message-ID: <20080605155033.GB29085@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200805011735.52447.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080502155719.GT29202@caradoc.them.org> <200805041837.44909.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200805271955.04084.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805271955.04084.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 07:55:03PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Dan, > do you have any further comments on this patch, or it's OK to commit? The code patch is OK with the revised docs. Why are the *running checks in the testsuite optional - shouldn't it always be produced now? I hope you're right that adding *running in mi2 output won't break frontends :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery