From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17995 invoked by alias); 30 May 2008 15:23:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 17987 invoked by uid 22791); 30 May 2008 15:23:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 May 2008 15:22:33 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FF89830E; Fri, 30 May 2008 15:22:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C78980F7; Fri, 30 May 2008 15:22:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K26R4-00056O-32; Fri, 30 May 2008 11:22:30 -0400 Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 16:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pierre Muller Cc: 'Mark Kettenis' , pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PING2] : [RFC/RFA] PING: skip __main Message-ID: <20080530152230.GA19318@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Muller , 'Mark Kettenis' , pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <004f01c8ac58$06a1ddb0$13e59910$@u-strasbg.fr> <000c01c8c246$de300f50$9a902df0$@u-strasbg.fr> <200805301157.m4UBvOL5009408@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <001901c8c256$06f8be00$14ea3a00$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001901c8c256$06f8be00$14ea3a00$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00776.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote: > Thanks for the fast reply. > > > I'm afraid I think that skip_main_constructor_call is too long as a name. > > I am perfectly willing to use something shorter, > the only problem is to find something that would still be > of clear meaning. > > maybe > skip_main_prologue > would be better? Just skip_main_constructor? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery