From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-56360-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10270 invoked by alias); 29 May 2008 16:46:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 10259 invoked by uid 22791); 29 May 2008 16:46:56 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 May 2008 16:46:39 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m4TGjCCn017742; 	Thu, 29 May 2008 18:45:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id m4TGjCRu006229; 	Thu, 29 May 2008 18:45:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 12:00:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200805291645.m4TGjCRu006229@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: uweigand@de.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20080529164003.GB11646@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Thu, 29 May 2008 12:40:03 -0400)
Subject: Re: [rfc/rft] Update remaining targets to value-based unwinding
References: <200805182015.m4IKFQmx030794@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20080529164003.GB11646@caradoc.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00761.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:40:03 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:15:25PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > the following patch switches all remaining patches to use value-based
> > unwinding.  This is completely untested except for ensuring that 
> > --enable-targets=all successfully builds again.  (In fact that way my
> > major motivation, to be able to use --enable-targets again as a means
> > of better compile-testing cross-target changes ...)
> > 
> > I'm not suggesting to commit this right now; but if anyone has access
> > to one of the targets converted by this patch, I'd certainly welcome
> > test reports.
> 
> Hi Ulrich,
> 
> At this point I think you've gotten all the likely testing; is it time
> to commit this?

I'm already looking at m88k; if you commit it Ulrich, can you leave
that bit out?