From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24694 invoked by alias); 27 May 2008 19:11:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 24685 invoked by uid 22791); 27 May 2008 19:11:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate2.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.151) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 May 2008 19:10:53 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate2.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4RJAn3E058606 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 19:10:49 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m4RJAnkR3989718 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 21:10:49 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m4RJAnn3024542 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 21:10:49 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id m4RJAnZP024539; Tue, 27 May 2008 21:10:49 +0200 Message-Id: <200805271910.m4RJAnZP024539@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 27 May 2008 21:10:49 +0200 Subject: Re: [patch/mdebug] symbol symtab not set on Tru64 To: brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker) Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 07:23:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080527185819.GA4057@adacore.com> from "Joel Brobecker" at May 27, 2008 11:58:19 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00720.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > As a result, we end up with SEGVs or failed assertions when trying > > > to access this field because it was NULL. Fixed thusly. > > > > Is this a regression due to my recent SYMBOL_SYMTAB cleanup patch? > > Your patch might have made the problem more visible, not sure, but > the issue was introduced much earlier than this (I think early 2007), > when this new field was added. I noticed it a couple of weeks ago, > before you checked your cleanup patch in. Ah, OK. Just wondering whether I missed something ... Thanks, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com