From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11464 invoked by alias); 23 May 2008 14:31:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 11450 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2008 14:31:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 May 2008 14:30:47 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B9A980A0 for ; Fri, 23 May 2008 14:30:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DA69809F for ; Fri, 23 May 2008 14:30:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JzYI7-0008W1-M5 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 23 May 2008 10:30:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 19:53:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB C plugin system, and STL container viewer as an example Message-ID: <20080523143043.GA32366@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1211535909.8253.16.camel@bsr-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00682.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:20:36PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > I don't see how you report that fact that the number of children of a > varobj has changed. Without that, I'm not sure how useful MI display > of vectors is. Am I missing something? Just my two cents but... rather than encourage further work on the C mechanism, is there anyone besides me who could start reviewing the Python patches, so that we can converge on a single mechanism and get it into the tree? If everyone waits for me to get around to it, it's going to be a while. Vincent, are you at all interested in taking the code you've written and integrating it with the gdb+python repository? (If so, you'll need a copyright assignment, if you haven't got one already.) FYI, I am unlikely to be reviewing patches for the next week or two unless my plans turn out to be much more boring than I expect :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery