From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4584 invoked by alias); 21 May 2008 15:17:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 4573 invoked by uid 22791); 21 May 2008 15:17:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate4.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate4.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 May 2008 15:17:10 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate4.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4LFH7dO288312 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 15:17:07 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m4LFH6cp1499140 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 17:17:06 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m4LFH5Tc006017 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 17:17:05 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id m4LFH4DW005947; Wed, 21 May 2008 17:17:04 +0200 Message-Id: <200805211517.m4LFH4DW005947@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 21 May 2008 17:17:04 +0200 Subject: Re: [patch]: Get rid of deprecated_print_address_numeric To: deuling@de.ibm.com (Markus Deuling) Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 18:36:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org (GDB Patches) In-Reply-To: <4833BD3F.1070302@de.ibm.com> from "Markus Deuling" at May 21, 2008 08:12:15 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00636.txt.bz2 Markus Deuling wrote: > thanks. I reworked that patch now and also integrated the other occurences of paddress > where suitable. Re-tested on x86_64 without regression. > > Is this Ok ? This is OK (with ChangeLog, of course). Thanks, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com