From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-56211-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29217 invoked by alias); 20 May 2008 18:41:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 29205 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2008 18:41:37 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from pool-72-74-94-32.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO ednor.cgf.cx) (72.74.94.32)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 May 2008 18:41:20 +0000
Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) 	id 4593C23B063; Tue, 20 May 2008 14:41:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 03:19:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] control-c handling on Windows...
Message-ID: <20080520184118.GA20086@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, 	Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
References: <20080507205611.GB7421@adacore.com> <20080509202942.GA4386@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080510013336.GC28890@adacore.com> <20080510043413.GA5429@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080510153102.GE28890@adacore.com> <20080510180010.GF28890@adacore.com> <20080510194232.GC17229@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080511164043.GJ28890@adacore.com> <20080516193438.GA4413@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080520183820.GB3895@adacore.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080520183820.GB3895@adacore.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00612.txt.bz2

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:38:20AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>> Checking this in is ok with me but it would be nice to consider a better
>> solution eventually.  Could you put a note to that effect in the patch
>
>Attached is the patch that I ended up checking in. Let me know if you'd
>like me to make some adjustments to the comment...
>
>2008-05-20  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
>
>        * win32-nat.c (win32_wait): Block the control-c event while
>        waiting for a debug event.

Looks good.  Thanks for persisting in getting this in.

cgf