From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20500 invoked by alias); 20 May 2008 18:24:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 20492 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2008 18:24:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 May 2008 18:24:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC82E2A9962; Tue, 20 May 2008 14:24:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nk9IhXg7YD-3; Tue, 20 May 2008 14:24:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2332A9968; Tue, 20 May 2008 14:24:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5560EE7ACD; Tue, 20 May 2008 11:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 22:54:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] New annotation for threads Message-ID: <20080520182401.GA3895@adacore.com> References: <18454.43094.168458.742737@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080501181758.GD3801@adacore.com> <18458.21177.959458.278174@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080501233703.GF3801@adacore.com> <18458.23326.25887.70597@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18478.48682.13900.951343@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18479.62120.536436.427524@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080520035226.GA4669@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00609.txt.bz2 > Those empty lines are the canonical ChangeLog format as Emacs > generates it: each file has an empty line before its first entry. > > Why do you want Nick to remove them? Because all the changes are inter-related. Here is what the GNU Coding Standards say about this: | Separate unrelated change log entries with blank lines. When two entries | represent parts of the same change, so that they work together, then | don't put blank lines between them. Then you can omit the file name and | the asterisk when successive entries are in the same file. -- Joel