From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6639 invoked by alias); 19 May 2008 21:55:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 6625 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2008 21:55:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate4.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate4.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 May 2008 21:55:06 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate4.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4JLt2sw285232 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 21:55:02 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m4JLt2Zc2666662 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 23:55:02 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m4JLt12v019752 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 23:55:01 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id m4JLt197019746; Mon, 19 May 2008 23:55:01 +0200 Message-Id: <200805192155.m4JLt197019746@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 19 May 2008 23:55:01 +0200 Subject: Re: [rfc/rft] Update remaining targets to value-based unwinding To: dj@redhat.com (DJ Delorie) Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 07:54:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <200805192024.m4JKOUXk024408@greed.delorie.com> from "DJ Delorie" at May 19, 2008 04:24:30 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2 DJ Delorie wrote: > > I'm not suggesting to commit this right now; but if anyone has access > > to one of the targets converted by this patch, I'd certainly welcome > > test reports. > > These are all sim-based results: Thanks for testing! Do you know how those results compare to prior versions (before Daniel's value-based unwinding changes)? > m32c (two multilibs): > > # of expected passes 17068 > # of unexpected failures 2758 In particular, this result looks a bit worrisome ... Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com