From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28306 invoked by alias); 17 May 2008 13:58:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 28295 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2008 13:58:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (HELO vms044pub.verizon.net) (206.46.252.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 May 2008 13:58:18 +0000 Received: from black ([71.245.67.80]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K10005D7MSM9V98@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Sat, 17 May 2008 08:57:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from bob by black with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JxMv7-00032p-DZ; Sat, 17 May 2008 09:57:57 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 03:20:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi Subject: Re: [PATCH] New annotation for threads In-reply-to: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Nick Roberts , brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Mail-followup-to: Eli Zaretskii , Nick Roberts , brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-id: <20080517135757.GK6437@brasko.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: <18440.29531.916381.569346@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080429023735.GD841@adacore.com> <18454.43094.168458.742737@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080501181758.GD3801@adacore.com> <18458.21177.959458.278174@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080501233703.GF3801@adacore.com> <18458.23326.25887.70597@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18478.48682.13900.951343@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00533.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:53:02PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Nick Roberts > > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 23:14:50 +1200 > > Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > > Documenting a feature helps and encourages it's use. > > Then you should submit a patch to remove all docs of annotations from > the manual, and try to convince us to accept it. Not documenting just > one piece is inconsistent and doesn't make sense. I would object to a patch like this. I think that it should be obvious that the mi is still heavily under development. I feel confident that Vladmir might be able to get it usable and stable if he keeps up the good work. Maybe at that point we'd be ready to official drop mi. Bob Rossi