From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20963 invoked by alias); 16 May 2008 15:27:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 22360 invoked by uid 22791); 16 May 2008 13:11:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate7.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate7.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.156) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:10:54 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate7.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4GD9WKI287608 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:09:32 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m4GD9XdK4346064 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 15:09:33 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m4GD9WGA007665 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 15:09:32 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id m4GD9WMC007662; Fri, 16 May 2008 15:09:32 +0200 Message-Id: <200805161309.m4GD9WMC007662@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 16 May 2008 15:09:32 +0200 Subject: Re: [rfc] Fix problem with (maybe) non-relocated .opd section on powerpc64-linux To: drow@false.org (Daniel Jacobowitz) Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 18:06:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080515182133.GA12681@caradoc.them.org> from "Daniel Jacobowitz" at May 15, 2008 02:21:33 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00505.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > As I understand symfile_relocate_debug_section, this would still *not* > > take the load address of a shared library into account, so that part > > would still need to be applied manually, right? > > I believe so - ANOFFSET? ANOFFSET is also a obj_section thing, but we have target sections in the convert_from_func_ptr callback ... Why do we need to keep section data in both the target and the objfile? Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com