From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20869 invoked by alias); 16 May 2008 15:27:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 21740 invoked by uid 22791); 16 May 2008 13:08:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate1.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.150) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:08:08 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4GD85Ao133002 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:08:05 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m4GD85Lk2244822 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 15:08:05 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m4GD85uc005380 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 15:08:05 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id m4GD84KX005377; Fri, 16 May 2008 15:08:04 +0200 Message-Id: <200805161308.m4GD84KX005377@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 16 May 2008 15:08:04 +0200 Subject: Re: Overlay support broken (Re: [patch] [2/2] Discontiguous PSYMTABs (psymtabs->symtabs by addrmap)) To: drow@false.org (Daniel Jacobowitz) Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 18:32:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com (Jan Kratochvil), gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20080515170237.GB6488@caradoc.them.org> from "Daniel Jacobowitz" at May 15, 2008 01:02:37 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00506.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Yes, I don't like that part either. I wonder if the memory usage > would be too bad if we kept an addrmap for each section and one > combined one for the non-overlay case? Hmm, maybe this would even save memory; a per-section addrmap would not need to store any result except from the boolean "address in section or not" flag ... Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com