From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18041 invoked by alias); 15 May 2008 19:21:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 16353 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2008 19:20:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 May 2008 19:19:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1889B2A993C; Thu, 15 May 2008 15:19:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nSMETDMwk9Ea; Thu, 15 May 2008 15:19:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A4D2A9905; Thu, 15 May 2008 15:19:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 869C8E7ACD; Thu, 15 May 2008 12:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 20:05:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , aristovski@qnx.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] new substitute path when loading feature Message-ID: <20080515191945.GB1744@adacore.com> References: <20080513190818.GA13776@caradoc.them.org> <4829E7DA.3010606@qnx.com> <20080513192041.GA14593@caradoc.them.org> <20080515160551.GA24101@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00484.txt.bz2 > Can we please augment this with some minimal band-aid for when > backslashes and colons are literally used in a file name? Something > like a user option to disable this feature and use normal Posix > file-name syntax? I figure this would be enough, since mixing object > files compiled on Posix and Windows platforms should be _really_ rare. That would make sense indeed. -- Joel