From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14721 invoked by alias); 15 May 2008 17:40:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 14711 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2008 17:40:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate4.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate4.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 May 2008 17:39:58 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate4.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4FHdlO7096438 for ; Thu, 15 May 2008 17:39:47 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m4FHdlvC3961042 for ; Thu, 15 May 2008 19:39:47 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m4FHdkmO010371 for ; Thu, 15 May 2008 19:39:46 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id m4FHdkZu010367; Thu, 15 May 2008 19:39:46 +0200 Message-Id: <200805151739.m4FHdkZu010367@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 15 May 2008 19:39:46 +0200 Subject: Re: Overlay support broken (Re: [patch] [2/2] Discontiguous PSYMTABs (psymtabs->symtabs by addrmap)) To: drow@false.org (Daniel Jacobowitz) Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 19:06:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com (Jan Kratochvil), gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20080515170237.GB6488@caradoc.them.org> from "Daniel Jacobowitz" at May 15, 2008 01:02:37 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00474.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Yes, I don't like that part either. I wonder if the memory usage > would be too bad if we kept an addrmap for each section and one > combined one for the non-overlay case? > > I don't know what overlay debug info looks like. Can we detect > overlays in any practical way when reading in symbols? Not really, I don't think there is any indication in the debug info that we have an overlay. The address ranges just happen to overlap ... Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com