From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32436 invoked by alias); 14 May 2008 18:10:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 32427 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2008 18:10:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 May 2008 18:09:48 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7F6983FB; Wed, 14 May 2008 18:09:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C36983F9; Wed, 14 May 2008 18:09:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JwLQ9-0003Qc-B5; Wed, 14 May 2008 14:09:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 18:29:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, bauerman@br.ibm.com, amodra@bigpond.net.au Subject: Re: Shared library call problems on PowerPC with current binutils/gdb Message-ID: <20080514180945.GA13147@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, bauerman@br.ibm.com, amodra@bigpond.net.au References: <20080503161858.GB22851@caradoc.them.org> <200805141805.m4EI5SJk012132@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805141805.m4EI5SJk012132@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-05) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00437.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 08:05:28PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Now that Alan's synthetic symbol patch is in, this patch fixed a > number of regressions on both ppc and ppc64. In particular I need > at least the minsyms.c part to fix regressions introduced by Alan's > patch (because we now have both the @plt synthetic symbol *and* and > old-style solib_trampoline at the same address ...). > > Were you planning on installing this patch, or are you still looking > for some other solution? I was waiting to hear from you; I think the limitations of the patch are annoying but acceptable. Maybe someone will be inspired to improve it later. I'll install it now. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery