From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3372 invoked by alias); 13 May 2008 21:00:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 3364 invoked by uid 22791); 13 May 2008 21:00:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 May 2008 20:59:44 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51CE80001; Tue, 13 May 2008 20:59:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B59982C4; Tue, 13 May 2008 20:59:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jw1b3-0005Va-B1; Tue, 13 May 2008 16:59:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 23:16:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Doug Evans , Michael Snyder Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix for mishandling of "break 'pthread_create@GLIBC_2.2.5'" Message-ID: <20080513205941.GA21147@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Pluzhnikov , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Doug Evans , Michael Snyder References: <8ac60eac0805131135h5e9dd46ev8b7f39e660bf0bb7@mail.gmail.com> <20080513184447.GA12349@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0805131351s241d33a8pd7d9839c51e53a8d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0805131351s241d33a8pd7d9839c51e53a8d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-05) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00414.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 01:51:57PM -0700, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > Actually, that appears to already work: Then I don't understand. If we're not looking for a field because of the ".1" then why are we looking for a field? The @ is not inherently special in ELF; there's other strange characters that are valid in symbol names (minsyms). So inside quotes we shouldn't be trying to interpret it as anything. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery