From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21180 invoked by alias); 11 May 2008 16:00:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 21171 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2008 16:00:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 May 2008 16:00:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3C02A9850; Sun, 11 May 2008 12:00:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LnH8FeqIv4XN; Sun, 11 May 2008 12:00:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0DA2A984E; Sun, 11 May 2008 12:00:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 93B9BE7ACD; Sun, 11 May 2008 09:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 20:34:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFC] 09/10 Add "continue --all" Message-ID: <20080511160001.GI28890@adacore.com> References: <200805061649.50105.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080509014720.GB22833@caradoc.them.org> <200805090307.47327.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200805091308.28842.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080509122003.GA24290@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080509122003.GA24290@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00359.txt.bz2 > If you don't like the all prefix then we can go back to continue > --all, or even just continue all. Continue takes a numeric argument > and all will not conflict. FWIW, I like "continue all", but I think I prefer the "all" prefix. I would probably have "all continue" be its own command rather than having it an alias of "thread apply all continue" for the reasons that Pedro mentioned, and it shouldn't be much more work than the solution based on command aliasing. Using the "all" command prefix would be very elegant when we add more commands. This assumes that there are other commands that we'd like to provide under that same prefix. -- Joel