From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10070 invoked by alias); 6 May 2008 21:38:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 10061 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2008 21:38:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 May 2008 21:37:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D642A9935; Tue, 6 May 2008 17:37:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Eac03-D9rJGl; Tue, 6 May 2008 17:37:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CB12A98C9; Tue, 6 May 2008 17:37:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B0443E7ACD; Tue, 6 May 2008 14:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 11:36:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jerome Guitton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] backtrace in mixed language applications (take 2) Message-ID: <20080506213752.GB3702@adacore.com> References: <20070810100313.GA29799@adacore.com> <20080109204712.GJ21281@adacore.com> <20080129180025.GH3773@caradoc.them.org> <20080204205620.GE21614@adacore.com> <20080204210336.GF21614@adacore.com> <20080424013033.GA5814@adacore.com> <20080501194818.GK22218@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080501194818.GK22218@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 > > Since the adjustments from the previous iteration were relatively > > minor, I will commit in a week unless someone objects (or approves :). > > Hopefully the patch still applies cleanly - I'll retest in any case. > > Looks OK to me. Thanks, Daniel, for double-checking the patch. I just checked it in. -- Joel