From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18408 invoked by alias); 6 May 2008 18:39:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 18399 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2008 18:39:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 May 2008 18:39:12 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E829835A; Tue, 6 May 2008 18:39:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F61980F7; Tue, 6 May 2008 18:39:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JtS4D-0000hw-3E; Tue, 06 May 2008 14:39:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 20:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: vladimir@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] bpstat_do_actions in one place Message-ID: <20080506183909.GA2696@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , vladimir@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200805051304.05449.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080505114824.GB22274@caradoc.them.org> <200805051658.32272.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080505192315.GA19885@caradoc.them.org> <20080505194130.GA20958@caradoc.them.org> <20080506124322.GA12429@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00248.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:30:22PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > (gdb) break 4 > > (gdb) commands > > > backtrace > > And `q' here will be typed by hand, assuming that the backtrace is > longer than one page? Pagination length queues up between prompts. So even if the backtrace is only a few lines, after a dozen times around the loop we'll prompt. > > This loop is tricky to interrupt. But I see now that the entire > > commands list will still be interrupted by quit so we will not execute > > the continue. > > Sounds like a bug to me. At least I won't expect it to do that. What would you expect to happen? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery