From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18846 invoked by alias); 4 May 2008 17:22:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 18833 invoked by uid 22791); 4 May 2008 17:22:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 May 2008 17:22:37 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8495F983F0; Sun, 4 May 2008 17:22:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7061A9829E; Sun, 4 May 2008 17:22:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jshv0-0001X0-RZ; Sun, 04 May 2008 13:22:34 -0400 Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 17:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fix MI/async testsuite Message-ID: <20080504172234.GB18323@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200805041618.14962.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080504163321.GA17507@caradoc.them.org> <200805042048.21287.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080504171430.GA18323@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080504171430.GA18323@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 01:14:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Why should we print ^running before we are ready for more input? > > *running, yes, soon as the target starts running. But ^running is the > result of the command and should show up when the command is done, > shouldn't it? Duh, this is because of sync mode, right? Anyway, it seems like "gdb accepts input after -exec-continue" and "gdb uses *running instead of ^running" should have the same condition, to avoid this weird output. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery