On Fri, 02 May 2008 17:44:47 +0200, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 03:22:25PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > There is a problem whole EXEC_BFD becomes stale - using the more general
> > attached patch.
> 
> Does this work if you just call exec_file_attach instead of
> exec_ops.to_open?  The difference is target_preopen which I do not
> believe we want here.

Thanks, it works (I was tryint to use exec_file_command instead before).


> If that works, it's OK to commit.

Committed, no regressions on native x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.


Regards,
Jan