From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16673 invoked by alias); 4 May 2008 00:29:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 16665 invoked by uid 22791); 4 May 2008 00:29:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 May 2008 00:29:26 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F113983D9; Sun, 4 May 2008 00:29:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F06A98150; Sun, 4 May 2008 00:29:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JsS6U-00035i-VZ; Sat, 03 May 2008 20:29:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 03:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Adam Nemet Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] add-symbol-file not to print address truncated Message-ID: <20080504002922.GA11584@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Adam Nemet , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <18460.63329.752236.534872@localhost.localdomain> <200805040043.26994.pedro@codesourcery.com> <18460.63955.147821.776423@localhost.localdomain> <200805040053.27168.pedro@codesourcery.com> <18461.19.864624.156635@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18461.19.864624.156635@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 05:15:15PM -0700, Adam Nemet wrote: > I can retest the patch without those bits then (which is pretty much an > obvious patch now) like: > > * symfile.c (add_symbol_file_command): Use paddress rather than > hex_string to print the address. This is definitely OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery