From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 811 invoked by alias); 3 May 2008 20:56:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 800 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2008 20:56:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 May 2008 20:56:05 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4C4983D9; Sat, 3 May 2008 20:56:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ADB98150; Sat, 3 May 2008 20:56:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JsOm2-0006IO-Vv; Sat, 03 May 2008 16:56:02 -0400 Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 21:48:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent source file errors in --batch-silent mode Message-ID: <20080503205602.GB22704@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <480CD958.8010409@st.com> <20080501203347.GT22218@caradoc.them.org> <481AFC65.3070706@st.com> <20080502134418.GC29202@caradoc.them.org> <481B1E6F.7090408@st.com> <20080502140633.GF29202@caradoc.them.org> <1209790046.7034.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080503142635.GA17718@caradoc.them.org> <1209846868.7034.96.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1209846868.7034.96.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 I don't think we should have this discussion again. It's been had plenty of times in the past; if you want to restart it send me some mail off-list and I'll answer there. I am completely convinced that CVS->Subversion is a reasonable migration for the src repository and that CVS->distributed VC is not. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery