From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23330 invoked by alias); 3 May 2008 14:26:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 23316 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2008 14:26:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 May 2008 14:26:37 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F837983D9; Sat, 3 May 2008 14:26:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A7798150; Sat, 3 May 2008 14:26:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JsIh9-0004cB-K4; Sat, 03 May 2008 10:26:35 -0400 Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 15:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent source file errors in --batch-silent mode Message-ID: <20080503142635.GA17718@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <480CD958.8010409@st.com> <20080501203347.GT22218@caradoc.them.org> <481AFC65.3070706@st.com> <20080502134418.GC29202@caradoc.them.org> <481B1E6F.7090408@st.com> <20080502140633.GF29202@caradoc.them.org> <1209790046.7034.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1209790046.7034.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 01:47:26AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > and "switch src to svn 1.5 when it is released", FWIW. > > Hum... any reason in particular for that? It seems everyone keeps their > own version of the GDB source tree. Using a distributed VCS would ease > that work and benefit everybody... Because SVN is similar enough to CVS to be an easy transition and advanced enough that it can gateway to and from other VCS's (svk, git, presumably hg too) reliably for those who prefer something different. There's no need to break up everyone's workflow and I refuse to do it. > Besides, there are talks of moving gcc to a DVCS also, no? Not seriously that I'm aware of. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery