From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2254 invoked by alias); 3 May 2008 05:13:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 2242 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2008 05:13:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-72-74-94-32.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO ednor.cgf.cx) (72.74.94.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 May 2008 05:13:41 +0000 Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id A010F2B352; Sat, 3 May 2008 01:13:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 14:26:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent source file errors in --batch-silent mode Message-ID: <20080503051339.GA15866@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Daniel Jacobowitz References: <480CD958.8010409@st.com> <20080501203347.GT22218@caradoc.them.org> <481AFC65.3070706@st.com> <20080502134418.GC29202@caradoc.them.org> <481B1E6F.7090408@st.com> <20080502140633.GF29202@caradoc.them.org> <1209790046.7034.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1209790046.7034.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 01:47:26AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:06 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >>On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:00:15PM +0100, Andrew STUBBS wrote: >>>I think I've been spoilt by makefiles that generate the dependencies >>>automatically. :) >> >>Yeah. The next time there's a break in the furious feature development >>GDB's seen lately, and I have some time for infrastructure work, that >>is on my list. > >Nice. > >>The other items on that list are "move to bugzilla" > >Nice! > >>and "switch src to svn 1.5 when it is released", FWIW. > >Hum... any reason in particular for that? It seems everyone keeps >their own version of the GDB source tree. Using a distributed VCS >would ease that work and benefit everybody... > >Besides, there are talks of moving gcc to a DVCS also, no? > >Or is this flamebait and I've just bitten? :-) Maybe a little. We do have a read-only git mirror of the gcc svn repository now but I don't think anyone is talking about making it the official repository. If we wanted to, we could probably make a read-only git copy of the gdb cvs repo too. cgf