From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24666 invoked by alias); 2 May 2008 14:38:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 24656 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2008 14:38:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 May 2008 14:38:24 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D24983DA; Fri, 2 May 2008 14:38:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5A8983D6; Fri, 2 May 2008 14:38:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JrwP0-0000Gl-G9; Fri, 02 May 2008 10:38:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 14:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: 3/5 - Rework stepping over longjmp support Message-ID: <20080502143822.GI29202@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200804070331.14538.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080414184106.GF1968@caradoc.them.org> <200804251715.45780.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200804251715.45780.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 05:15:45PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Still OK? I'll check the new longjmp.exp test in along with this one. Looks fine to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery